A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel ††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project. For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the aut (2024)

César Hernández-Hernández, Thomas Chevet, Rihab el Houda Thabet, and Nicolas LangloisThe authors are with Université de Rouen Normandie, ESIGELEC, IRSEEM, 76000 Rouen, France{cesar.hernandez, thomas.chevet, rihab.hajrielhouda, nicolas.langlois}@esigelec.fr

Abstract

The study of droplet generation in wind tunnels in conducting icing experiments is of great importance in determining ice formation on structures or surfaces, where parameters such as Liquid Water Content (LWC) and Median Volumetric Diameter (MVD) play a relevant role.The measurement of these parameters requires specialised instrumentation.In this paper, several experiments have been carried out in a subsonic wind tunnel facility to study the parameters that are part of the icing process in structures.Furthermore, a mathematical modelling of the constituent subsystems of the plant study that allow us to have a comprehensive understanding of the behaviour of the system is developed using techniques based on first principles and machine learning techniques such as regression trees and neural networks.The simulation results show that the implementation of the model manages to obtain prominent expected values of LWC and MVD within the range of values obtained in the real experimental data.

Index Terms:

Mathematical model, subsonic icing wind tunnel, liquid water content (LWC), median volumetric diameter (MVD), regression tree, neural network.

I Introduction

In the process of structural icing, many parameters are involved, for instance, temperature, wind velocity, air pressure, humidity, liquid water content (LWC) and median volumetric diameter of water droplets (MVD).LWC is normally expressed as the number of grammes of liquid water per cubic meter of air.It represents the amount of supercooled water droplets that can impact the aircraft surface in a given air mass.The diameter of the water droplets is usually characterised as the median volumetric diameter normally expressed in micrometre, and LWC and MVD are closely related [1].Determining the LWC detection of the distribution of droplets produced by a spray system in a wind tunnel is of great importance to prevent ice formation.MVD is usually measured with different instruments, which generally require interaction with the droplets under sensitive conditions and are prone to fail under very icy conditions.Therefore, LWC and MVD are important factors in structural icing.

The possibility of ice formation under atmospheric conditions has become a major problem in different areas, such as in electrical networks [2], wind turbines [3, 4, 5], aircrafts [6, 7] and helicopters [8].

Considerable work has been done to study the physics and nature of ice formation [9], where LWC and MVD are highly essential parameters related to the occurrence of ice [10].In [11], the authors integrate three measurement devices into a wind tunnel to measure particle size distribution (PSD), MVD, and LWC.Moreover, in [12] a k𝑘kitalic_k-nearest neighbour-based model of ice intensity has been developed from wind velocity, LWC and MVD measurements from two instruments.In [13], variables related to LWC are studied to determine the effect on engine conditions due to the change in LWC and atmospheric conditions.

In this work, we propose a hybrid nonlinear mathematical model of a subsonic icing wind tunnel and its constituent subsystems.The model is developed and implemented in Matlab/Simulink [14], and obtains values that are within the range of experimental test values, where there are atmospheric conditions measurements that allow LWC values between 0.30.30.30.3 and 2.5gm3times2.5grammeter32.5\text{\,}\mathrm{g}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG 2.5 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_g end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG and MVD between 16.916.916.916.9 and 48.8µmtimes48.8micrometer48.8\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}start_ARG 48.8 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_µ roman_m end_ARG.To develop the hybrid model, we use models based on the lumped parameter approach [15] and data-driven models for the variables involved in the process.We show simulation results where different scenarios are considered to study the variables of interest LWC and MVD.

The remainder of the paper is organised as follows. Section II presents the information about the experimental plant.Section III presents the mathematical modelling of the plant.Section IV presents results obtained with the plant modelling implemented in simulation.Finally, Section V presents conclusions and future work.

II Experimental setup

In this work, we study an experimental plant consisting in a closed-loop subsonic wind tunnel associated with a water and air injection system.Before describing the modelling process, we introduce, in this section, information about this plant.To do so, we give a brief presentation of the two constituent parts.

The first part of the facilities is the water and air injection system.This system is composed of a water and an air tank, each connected to 12 conduits.Each of the 24 conduits possesses its control valve to regulate the flow.Finally, each water conduit is paired with an air conduit into a nozzle that injects a mixture of water and air into the second part of the facilities.

The second part is the wind tunnel itself.This tunnel is associated with a cooling chamber in order to maintain a negative temperature during experiments.These negative temperatures coupled with the injection system described before aim to generate an ice fog inside the wind tunnel to test defrost equipment.Control panels, allowing to adjust various parameters in the plant, are connected to it.

A schematic view of this plant is given in Figure 1.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (1)

II-A Equipment description

After this brief introduction, we now provide more details on the equipment of the icing wind tunnel facility.

The water tank is considered to be a closed cylindrical tank 1mtimes1meter1\text{\,}\mathrm{m}start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_m end_ARG high with a radius of approximately 20cmtimes20centimeter20\text{\,}\mathrm{cm}start_ARG 20 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_cm end_ARG.It has a capacity of 125Ltimes125liter125\text{\,}\mathrm{L}start_ARG 125 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG.This tank is pressurised by constant air injection at a pressure of 7bartimes7bar7\text{\,}\mathrm{bar}start_ARG 7 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_bar end_ARG, and is heated by five resistors (four of 500Wtimes500watt500\text{\,}\mathrm{W}start_ARG 500 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_W end_ARG and one of 300Wtimes300watt300\text{\,}\mathrm{W}start_ARG 300 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_W end_ARG).In addition, a pressure regulator valve is installed for safety purposes.In terms of sensors, the tank is equipped with a type J thermocouple, which is capable of measuring temperatures between 40-40-40- 40 and 375°Ctimes375degreeCelsius375\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}start_ARG 375 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG °C end_ARG.Finally, a sensor is present to measure the water level inside the tank.For its part, air tank is assumed to work as a blower, that is, the air coming from a pressurised air line is heated at a constant chosen temperature and injected into the system at a pressure of 7bartimes7bar7\text{\,}\mathrm{bar}start_ARG 7 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_bar end_ARG.

As mentioned above, each tank is connected to 12 conduits in which the flows are controlled by solenoid proportional valves.The 12 air valves are of type ASCO SCG202A001V and the 12 water valves are of type ASCO SCG202A051V.These valves are controlled by proportional integral (PI) controllers.Furthermore, each bus is equipped with flowmeters that can be used to measure air and water flows, as shown in Figure 2(a).

The droplets are accelerated and injected into the test section by nozzles of type SUJ16 pneumatic atomizers.Each nozzle has a heating patch that is used to maintain the temperature above 0°Ctimes0degreeCelsius0\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}start_ARG 0 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG °C end_ARG to prevent the water droplets from freezing before injection in the test section.

Figure 2(b) shows the front part of the test section.In this area, the velocity and temperature of the wind are controlled throughout the experiment by external control systems.

As detailed previously, the entire plant is used to test defrost systems.Therefore, it is necessary to control as accurately as possible the LWC and MVD of water droplets injected to perfectly characterize the tested devices.For the present works, this means that we require a precise model giving these LWC and MVD as a function of the injection system’s parameters.To do so, in previous experiments, a JRT measuring instrument was placed in front of the test section (see Figure 2(c)) to accurately measure LWC and MVD.The next section describes the data set obtained in these experiments.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (2)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (3)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (4)

II-B Experimentation and description of the data collected

To obtain LWC and MVD data for modelling, thirty experiments were carried out.Data were collected from sensors installed throughout the plant as described in the previous section.The data collected during these experiments are

  • the temperatures in the test section TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the water tank Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the air tank Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the nozzles Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, all in Celsius degrees;

  • the wind velocity in the test section vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in ms1metersecond1\mathrm{m}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG;

  • the LWC ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ in the test section in gm3grammeter3\mathrm{g}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG roman_g end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG;

  • the MVD MM\mathrm{M}roman_M in the test section in µmmicrometer\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}roman_µ roman_m;

  • the volumetric air flow per bus Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Lmin1literminute1\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{min}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_min end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG and volumetric water flow per bus Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Lh1literhour1\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_h end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG.

The liquid droplets produced by the atomisers have a size of 15151515 to 50µmtimes50micrometer50\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}start_ARG 50 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_µ roman_m end_ARG and are injected at a speed of 25252525 to 50ms1times50metersecond150\text{\,}\mathrm{m}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG 50 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG.In the test section, these droplets are supercooled at temperatures from 00 to 15°Ctimes-15degreeCelsius-15\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}start_ARG - 15 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG °C end_ARG.In such experiments, we obtain LWC values ranging from 0.10.10.10.1 to 2.5gm3times2.5grammeter32.5\text{\,}\mathrm{g}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG 2.5 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_g end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG, while MVD values range between 16.916.916.916.9 and 48.8µmtimes48.8micrometer48.8\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}start_ARG 48.8 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_µ roman_m end_ARG.Table I shows the main statistical indices of these experiments, calculated over thirty values for each variable, and Table II shows the correlation between the variables involved.

TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPTTwsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPTTasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPTTnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPTvTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPTΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛMM\mathrm{M}roman_MQasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPTQwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
mean6.5-6.5-6.5- 6.570.470.470.470.470.770.770.770.738.738.738.738.734.234.234.234.21.41.41.41.432.732.732.732.723.723.723.723.79.09.09.09.0
standard deviation2.92.92.92.91.01.01.01.01.81.81.81.810.110.110.110.112.312.312.312.30.90.90.90.99.79.79.79.717.617.617.617.62.82.82.82.8
minimum15.0-15.0-15.0- 15.067.067.067.067.068.068.068.068.024.024.024.024.025.025.025.025.00.30.30.30.316.916.916.916.910.010.010.010.04.54.54.54.5
25%times25percent25\text{\,}\mathrm{\char 37\relax}start_ARG 25 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG % end_ARG7.6-7.6-7.6- 7.670.070.070.070.070.070.070.070.031.631.631.631.625.025.025.025.00.60.60.60.625.425.425.425.410.010.010.010.08.18.18.18.1
50%times50percent50\text{\,}\mathrm{\char 37\relax}start_ARG 50 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG % end_ARG6.0-6.0-6.0- 6.070.170.170.170.170.070.070.070.037.837.837.837.825.025.025.025.01.01.01.01.030.930.930.930.915.015.015.015.08.18.18.18.1
75%times75percent75\text{\,}\mathrm{\char 37\relax}start_ARG 75 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG % end_ARG5.0-5.0-5.0- 5.071.071.071.071.070.070.070.070.042.042.042.042.050.050.050.050.02.52.52.52.542.842.842.842.830.030.030.030.011.211.211.211.2
maximum1.2-1.2-1.2- 1.273.073.073.073.074.074.074.074.070.070.070.070.050.050.050.050.02.52.52.52.548.848.848.848.855.055.055.055.013.513.513.513.5
TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPTTwsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPTTasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPTTnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPTvTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPTΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛMM\mathrm{M}roman_MQasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPTQwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT1.001.001.001.000.18-0.18-0.18- 0.180.05-0.05-0.05- 0.050.360.360.360.360.16-0.16-0.16- 0.160.390.390.390.390.11-0.11-0.11- 0.110.190.190.190.190.250.250.250.25
Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT0.18-0.18-0.18- 0.181.001.001.001.000.240.240.240.240.230.230.230.230.04-0.04-0.04- 0.040.200.200.200.200.080.080.080.080.20-0.20-0.20- 0.200.090.090.090.09
Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT0.05-0.05-0.05- 0.050.240.240.240.241.001.001.001.000.25-0.25-0.25- 0.250.230.230.230.230.030.030.030.030.240.240.240.240.33-0.33-0.33- 0.330.030.030.030.03
Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT0.360.360.360.360.230.230.230.230.25-0.25-0.25- 0.251.001.001.001.000.01-0.01-0.01- 0.010.480.480.480.480.080.080.080.080.07-0.07-0.07- 0.070.470.470.470.47
vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT0.16-0.16-0.16- 0.160.04-0.04-0.04- 0.040.230.230.230.230.01-0.01-0.01- 0.011.001.001.001.000.06-0.06-0.06- 0.060.16-0.16-0.16- 0.160.180.180.180.180.350.350.350.35
ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ0.390.390.390.390.200.200.200.200.030.030.030.030.480.480.480.480.06-0.06-0.06- 0.061.001.001.001.000.10-0.10-0.10- 0.100.01-0.01-0.01- 0.010.750.750.750.75
MM\mathrm{M}roman_M0.11-0.11-0.11- 0.110.080.080.080.080.240.240.240.240.080.080.080.080.16-0.16-0.16- 0.160.10-0.10-0.10- 0.101.001.001.001.000.83-0.83-0.83- 0.830.03-0.03-0.03- 0.03
Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT0.190.190.190.190.20-0.20-0.20- 0.200.33-0.33-0.33- 0.330.07-0.07-0.07- 0.070.180.180.180.180.01-0.01-0.01- 0.010.83-0.83-0.83- 0.831.001.001.001.000.020.020.020.02
Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT0.250.250.250.250.090.090.090.090.030.030.030.030.470.470.470.470.350.350.350.350.750.750.750.750.03-0.03-0.03- 0.030.020.020.020.021.001.001.001.00

The data collected in these former experiments is then used in the following section to get a numerical model usable for control and simulation.

III Modelling methodology

The development of mathematical models in icing wind tunnels is highly complex due to the large number of variables and complex processes involved.In this section, a hybrid nonlinear model is developed based on lumped parameters approach and machine learning techniques.With this strategy, we provide a mathematical representation for the water and air tanks, the flow control valves, the nozzles, and the test section, aiming to link the LWC and MVD with these components’ parameters.

III-A Water tank

As presented in Section II-A, one of the first elements of the plant we study in this paper is a water tank.To study the dynamic behaviour of this water tank, illustrated in Figure 3, we split the modelling into two parts.On the one hand, mass balance is used to model the level of water inside the tank.On the other hand, energy balance is used to model the influence of heat sources on the temperature of the water.

Water level

The water tank has a cross-sectional area S1subscript𝑆1S_{1}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in m2meter2{\mathrm{m}}^{2}power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG, and a height H𝐻Hitalic_H, in mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m.As mentioned in the previous section, the tank is pressurised, at all times, with a constant pressure P0=7barsubscript𝑃0times7barP_{0}=$7\text{\,}\mathrm{bar}$italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = start_ARG 7 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_bar end_ARG.At the bottom of the tank is an opening having a cross-sectional area S2subscript𝑆2S_{2}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in m2meter2{\mathrm{m}}^{2}power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG.When water is injected into the test section, this opening allows the tank to empty into the opened water buses.At this moment, the surface of the water in the tank flows down at a velocity v1subscript𝑣1v_{1}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while it flows at a velocity v2subscript𝑣2v_{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT through the orifice, both velocities being in ms1metersecond1\mathrm{m}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG.Finally, when emptying, the height of the liquid will evolve from an initial value h0subscript0h_{0}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m, to adopt a value h(t)𝑡h(t)italic_h ( italic_t ), in mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m.

The mass balance law provides the relation

dmdt=m˙iwm˙ow𝑑𝑚𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜\frac{dm}{dt}=\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_m end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(1)

where m𝑚mitalic_m is the water mass inside the tank, and m˙iwsubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and m˙owsubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the input and output fluids mass flow rate inside the tank.

Remark 1.

In the following, the input mass flow rate m˙iwsubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a control variable that is chosen by the user depending on the operational needs.In addition, m˙owsubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the water mass flow rate injected into the test section.

In the tank, the overall mass can be divided into a mass of water mwsubscript𝑚wm_{\text{w}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and a mass of air mwasubscript𝑚wam_{\text{wa}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wa end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, so that

dmwdt+dmwadt=m˙iwm˙ow.𝑑subscript𝑚w𝑑𝑡𝑑subscript𝑚wa𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜.\frac{dm_{\text{w}}}{dt}+\frac{dm_{\text{wa}}}{dt}=\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot%{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}\text{.}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_d italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wa end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .(2)

However, given the tank’s volume, we have mwmwamuch-greater-thansubscript𝑚wsubscript𝑚wam_{\text{w}}\gg m_{\text{wa}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wa end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.It follows that the mass of the air can be considered constant, so that

dmwdt=m˙iwm˙ow.𝑑subscript𝑚w𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜.\frac{dm_{\text{w}}}{dt}=\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}\text{.}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .(3)

As described before, the tank is cylindrical in shape and mw=ρwS1hsubscript𝑚wsubscript𝜌wsubscript𝑆1m_{\text{w}}=\rho_{\text{w}}S_{1}hitalic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h, with ρwsubscript𝜌w\rho_{\text{w}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the water density in kgm3kilogrammeter3\mathrm{kg}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG, so that

d(ρwS1h)dt=m˙iwm˙ow.𝑑subscript𝜌wsubscript𝑆1𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜.\frac{d(\rho_{\text{w}}S_{1}h)}{dt}=\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_%{o}\text{.}divide start_ARG italic_d ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .(4)

Therefore

dhdt=m˙iwm˙owρwS1𝑑𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜subscript𝜌wsubscript𝑆1\frac{dh}{dt}=\frac{\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}}{\rho_{\text%{w}}S_{1}}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_h end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = divide start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG(5)

where ρwsubscript𝜌w\rho_{\text{w}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in kgm3kilogrammeter3\mathrm{kg}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG, is the water density.

Water temperature

In terms of temperature, the energy change in volume control is due to several elements.The first source of change is the power provided by the heating system Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Wwatt\mathrm{W}roman_W.The second source are the losses caused by leaks to the outside of system κwTwsubscript𝜅wsubscript𝑇w-\kappa_{\text{w}}T_{\text{w}}- italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where κwsubscript𝜅w\kappa_{\text{w}}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in W°C1wattdegreeCelsius1\mathrm{W}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_W end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG °C end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, is a constant characterising the leaks, and Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in °CdegreeCelsius\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}°C, is the temperature in the water tank.The third source is the input energy provided by the incoming mass miCeTiwsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇w𝑖m_{i}C_{e}T^{\text{w}}_{i}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where Cesubscript𝐶𝑒C_{e}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Jkg1K1joulekilogram1kelvin1\mathrm{J}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{kg}}^{-1}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_J end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_K end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, is the water’s mass specific heat, and Tiwsubscriptsuperscript𝑇w𝑖T^{\text{w}}_{i}italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Kkelvin\mathrm{K}roman_K, is the temperature of the incoming water.Finally, the last source is the output energy provided by the outgoing mass moCeTwKsubscript𝑚𝑜subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwm_{o}C_{e}T^{\text{K}}_{\text{w}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where TwK=Tw+273.15subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwsubscript𝑇w273.15T^{\text{K}}_{\text{w}}=T_{\text{w}}+273.15italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 273.15 is the temperature in the water tank expressed in Kelvin.Then, considering the energy E𝐸Eitalic_E, in Jjoule\mathrm{J}roman_J, of liquid water at a certain temperature, we have

E=mwCeTwK𝐸subscript𝑚wsubscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇KwE=m_{\text{w}}C_{e}T^{\text{K}}_{\text{w}}italic_E = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(6)

The energy rate of change is then

dEdt=dmwdtCeTwK+mwCedTwdt𝑑𝐸𝑑𝑡𝑑subscript𝑚w𝑑𝑡subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwsubscript𝑚wsubscript𝐶𝑒𝑑subscript𝑇w𝑑𝑡\frac{dE}{dt}=\frac{dm_{\text{w}}}{dt}C_{e}T^{\text{K}}_{\text{w}}+m_{\text{w}%}C_{e}\frac{dT_{\text{w}}}{dt}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_E end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_d italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG(7)

and, using (1) into (7),

dEdt=(m˙iwm˙ow)CeTwK+mwCedTwdt.𝑑𝐸𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwsubscript𝑚wsubscript𝐶𝑒𝑑subscript𝑇w𝑑𝑡.\frac{dE}{dt}=(\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o})C_{e}T^{\text{K}}%_{\text{w}}+m_{\text{w}}C_{e}\frac{dT_{\text{w}}}{dt}\text{.}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_E end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = ( over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG .(8)

Given what we have described above, we have

dEdt=Ce(m˙iwTiwm˙owTwK)+QwκwTw𝑑𝐸𝑑𝑡subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript𝑇w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwsubscript𝑄wsubscript𝜅wsubscript𝑇w\frac{dE}{dt}=C_{e}(\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}T^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_%{o}T^{\text{K}}_{\text{w}})+Q_{\text{w}}-\kappa_{\text{w}}T_{\text{w}}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_E end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(9)

so that

(m˙iwm˙ow)CeTwK+mCedTwdt=m˙iwCeTiwm˙owCeTwK+QwκwTwsubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kw𝑚subscript𝐶𝑒𝑑subscript𝑇w𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇w𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑜subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwsubscript𝑄wsubscript𝜅wsubscript𝑇w(\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o})C_{e}T^{\text{K}}_{\text{w}}+mC%_{e}\frac{dT_{\text{w}}}{dt}\\=\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}C_{e}T^{\text{w}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{o}C_{e}T^{%\text{K}}_{\text{w}}+Q_{\text{w}}-\kappa_{\text{w}}T_{\text{w}}start_ROW start_CELL ( over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW(10)

or

dTwdt=m˙iwCe(TiwTwK)+QwκwTwmwCe.𝑑subscript𝑇w𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚w𝑖subscript𝐶𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝑇w𝑖subscriptsuperscript𝑇Kwsubscript𝑄wsubscript𝜅wsubscript𝑇wsubscript𝑚wsubscript𝐶𝑒.\frac{dT_{\text{w}}}{dt}=\frac{\dot{m}^{\text{w}}_{i}C_{e}(T^{\text{w}}_{i}-T^%{\text{K}}_{\text{w}})+Q_{\text{w}}-\kappa_{\text{w}}T_{\text{w}}}{m_{\text{w}%}C_{e}}\text{.}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = divide start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .(11)

III-B Air tank

The second element of the plant described in Section II-A is the air tank.In this Section, this air tank is described as a blower.It follows that its geometry is not relevant for modelling purposes, and the important elements are the density of the air blown and its temperature.

As mentioned in [16], following the law of conservation of matter [17, 18], the air tank mass variation is equal to the mass flow inlet m˙iasubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚a𝑖\dot{m}^{\text{a}}_{i}over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT minus the mass flow injected into the test section m˙oasubscriptsuperscript˙𝑚a𝑜\dot{m}^{\text{a}}_{o}over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.In addition, the mass of air in the tank masubscript𝑚am_{\text{a}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be written ma=ρaVATsubscript𝑚asubscript𝜌asubscript𝑉ATm_{\text{a}}=\rho_{\text{a}}V_{\text{AT}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT AT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where ρasubscript𝜌a\rho_{\text{a}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in kgm3kilogrammeter3\mathrm{kg}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG is the air density, and VATsubscript𝑉ATV_{\text{AT}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT AT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in m3meter3{\mathrm{m}}^{3}power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG, is the volume of the air tank.It follows that the variation of air density in the air tank is

dρadt=m˙iam˙oaVAT.𝑑subscript𝜌a𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚a𝑖subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚a𝑜subscript𝑉AT.\frac{d\rho_{\text{a}}}{dt}=\frac{\dot{m}^{\text{a}}_{i}-\dot{m}^{\text{a}}_{o%}}{V_{\text{AT}}}\text{.}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = divide start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT AT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .(12)

With regard to temperature, the same methodology that has been used for the water tank has been followed.Therefore, the evolution of the air temperature in the air tank is

dTadt=m˙iaCp(Tia(Ta+273.15))+QaκaTamaCp𝑑subscript𝑇a𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript˙𝑚a𝑖subscript𝐶𝑝subscriptsuperscript𝑇a𝑖subscript𝑇a273.15subscript𝑄asubscript𝜅asubscript𝑇asubscript𝑚asubscript𝐶𝑝\frac{dT_{\text{a}}}{dt}=\frac{\dot{m}^{\text{a}}_{i}C_{p}(T^{\text{a}}_{i}-(T%_{\text{a}}+273.15))+Q_{\text{a}}-\kappa_{\text{a}}T_{\text{a}}}{m_{\text{a}}C%_{p}}divide start_ARG italic_d italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = divide start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 273.15 ) ) + italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG(13)

where Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in °CdegreeCelsius\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}°C, is the temperature of air in the air tank, Tiasubscriptsuperscript𝑇a𝑖T^{\text{a}}_{i}italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Kkelvin\mathrm{K}roman_K, the temperature of the air injected inside the tank, Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Wwatt\mathrm{W}roman_W, the power provided by the heating system, Cpsubscript𝐶𝑝C_{p}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the air’s mass specific heat, in Jkg1K1joulekilogram1kelvin1\mathrm{J}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{kg}}^{-1}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_J end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_K end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, and κasubscript𝜅a\kappa_{\text{a}}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in W°C1wattdegreeCelsius1\mathrm{W}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_W end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG °C end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, a constant characterizing the leaks.

III-C Flow control valves

The elements placed right after the water and air tank are flow control valves allowing to control the flow of the mix of air and water injected into the test section of the plant.As mentioned in Section II-A, these water and air control valves are proportional solenoid valves.Table III shows the main characteristics of these valves.

Orifice size (mm)millimeter($\mathrm{mm}$)( roman_mm )1.21.21.21.2
Flow factor 𝑲𝒗subscript𝑲𝒗\boldsymbol{K_{v}}bold_italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (m3h1meter3hour1{\mathrm{m}}^{3}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_h end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG)0.050.050.050.05
Operation pressure (barbar\mathrm{bar}roman_bar)[0,16]016[0,16][ 0 , 16 ]

Water valve

According to the technical report [19] of the water valve provided by the manufacturer, the volumetric flow of water through a valve Qwvsubscript𝑄wvQ_{\text{wv}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a function of the valve’s opening area A𝐴Aitalic_A, in m2meter2{\mathrm{m}}^{2}power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG, the discharge coefficient Cdsubscript𝐶𝑑C_{d}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the pressure difference ΔPwvΔsubscript𝑃wv\Delta P_{\text{wv}}roman_Δ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Papascal\mathrm{Pa}roman_Pa, in the valve, and the density of water ρwsubscript𝜌w\rho_{\text{w}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in kgm3kilogrammeter3\mathrm{kg}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG - 3 end_ARG end_ARG, and is given by

Qwv=ACd2ΔPwvρw.subscript𝑄wv𝐴subscript𝐶𝑑2Δsubscript𝑃wvsubscript𝜌w.Q_{\text{wv}}=AC_{d}\sqrt{2\frac{\Delta P_{\text{wv}}}{\rho_{\text{w}}}}\text{.}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_A italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 2 divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG .(14)

The discharge coefficient Cdsubscript𝐶𝑑C_{d}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is obtained as

Cd=4KvπD2ρw2subscript𝐶𝑑4subscript𝐾𝑣𝜋superscript𝐷2subscript𝜌w2C_{d}=\frac{4K_{v}}{\pi D^{2}}\sqrt{\frac{\rho_{\text{w}}}{2}}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 4 italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_π italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG(15)

where Kvsubscript𝐾𝑣K_{v}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the flow factor, in m3h1meter3hour1{\mathrm{m}}^{3}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}start_ARG power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_h end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, given by the manufacturer, and D𝐷Ditalic_D, in mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m, is the diameter of the valve’s orifice.The difference of pressure ΔPwvΔsubscript𝑃wv\Delta P_{\text{wv}}roman_Δ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is obtained as

ΔPwv=12ξρwvwv2Δsubscript𝑃wv12𝜉subscript𝜌wsuperscriptsubscript𝑣wv2\Delta P_{\text{wv}}=\frac{1}{2}\xi\rho_{\text{w}}v_{\text{wv}}^{2}roman_Δ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ξ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT(16)

where ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ is the pressure drop coefficient and vwvsubscript𝑣wvv_{\text{wv}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT wv end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in ms1metersecond1\mathrm{m}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, is the velocity at which water flows through the valve.The pressure drop coefficient ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ is given by

ξ=πD48000Kv2𝜉𝜋superscript𝐷48000superscriptsubscript𝐾𝑣2\xi=\frac{\pi D^{4}}{8000K_{v}^{2}}italic_ξ = divide start_ARG italic_π italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 8000 italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG(17)

Air valve

Through the air valve, the volumetric flow Qavsubscript𝑄avQ_{\text{av}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT av end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is given by [20, 21]

Qav=Aρa2γR(γ1)PaTa(PavPa)1γ1(PavPa)γ1γsubscript𝑄av𝐴subscript𝜌a2𝛾𝑅𝛾1subscript𝑃asubscript𝑇asuperscriptsubscript𝑃avsubscript𝑃a1𝛾1superscriptsubscript𝑃avsubscript𝑃a𝛾1𝛾Q_{\text{av}}=\frac{A}{\rho_{\text{a}}}\sqrt{\frac{2\gamma}{R(\gamma-1)}}\frac%{P_{\text{a}}}{\sqrt{T_{\text{a}}}}\left(\frac{P_{\text{av}}}{P_{\text{a}}}%\right)^{\frac{1}{\gamma}}\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{P_{\text{av}}}{P_{\text{a}}}%\right)^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT av end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_A end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG 2 italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG italic_R ( italic_γ - 1 ) end_ARG end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT av end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 1 - ( divide start_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT av end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_γ - 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG(18)

where γ=1.4𝛾1.4\gamma=1.4italic_γ = 1.4 is the ratio of specific heats, R=2870Jkg1K1𝑅times2870joulekilogram1kelvin1R=$2870\text{\,}\mathrm{J}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{kg}}^{-1}\text{${\cdot}$}{%\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$italic_R = start_ARG 2870 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_J end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_kg end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_K end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG is the air-gas constant, Pasubscript𝑃aP_{\text{a}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Papascal\mathrm{Pa}roman_Pa, is the air pressure in the air tank pressure, and Pavsubscript𝑃avP_{\text{av}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT av end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in Papascal\mathrm{Pa}roman_Pa, is the air pressure outside the control flow valve.

III-D Nozzles

Downstream the flow control valves we just described are nozzles at which level the air and water coming from the tanks are mixed and injected into the test section.Nozzles are elements that are used to increase wind velocity based on their geometry.As shown in Figure 1, twelve nozzles are installed at the entrance of the test section.They are arranged in three columns of four nozzles each.This Section aims to study the air velocity that each nozzle provides to the test section, as well as the temperature in the nozzles.A temperature higher than zero must be maintained so that there is no freezing in this part and the experiments can occur safely.As can be seen in Table I, temperatures between 24242424 and 70°Ctimes70degreeCelsius70\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}start_ARG 70 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG °C end_ARG are maintained in this area.

Velocity at the nozzles’ output

With regard to velocity, a very simplified model using Bernoulli’s continuity equation is used to determine the velocity provided by the nozzles towards the test section.Bernoulli’s equation can be viewed as a conservation of energy law for a flowing fluid.Figure 4 presents a schematic view the nozzles’ geometry.The input surface Sisubscript𝑆𝑖S_{i}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is taken 1.21.21.21.2 times bigger than the outlet surface Sosubscript𝑆𝑜S_{o}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.Hence, the velocity at the outlet of the nozzles is given by

Sivin=Sovonsubscript𝑆𝑖subscriptsuperscript𝑣n𝑖subscript𝑆𝑜subscriptsuperscript𝑣n𝑜S_{i}v^{\text{n}}_{i}=S_{o}v^{\text{n}}_{o}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(19)

where Sisubscript𝑆𝑖S_{i}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Sosubscript𝑆𝑜S_{o}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in m2meter2{\mathrm{m}}^{2}power start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG, are respectively the inlet and outlet surfaces, and vinsubscriptsuperscript𝑣n𝑖v^{\text{n}}_{i}italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vonsubscriptsuperscript𝑣n𝑜v^{\text{n}}_{o}italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in ms1metersecond1\mathrm{m}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_m end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, are the velocity of the air coming from the air tank and of the mix of air and water injected in the test section.It follows that

von=1.2vin.subscriptsuperscript𝑣n𝑜1.2subscriptsuperscript𝑣n𝑖v^{\text{n}}_{o}=1.2v^{\text{n}}_{i}.italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.2 italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .(20)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (7)
Remark 2.

As usual for this type of equipment [11], the velocity of the water injected inside the nozzle is not taken into account, as it is negligible.It is the pressure provoked by the air velocity that leads to the spraying of a mix of air and water at the output of the nozzle.

Data-driven model of the mix’s temperature in the nozzles

Temperatures in the nozzles Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are not measured by a sensor.However, it can be estimated by obtaining a mathematical model that depends on other known variables.To do so, we performed a statistical data analysis to identify variables that have a greater impact on the temperature of the mixture of air and water in the nozzles.We then extract a polynomial model of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT depending on the identified variable.

To determine which of the system’s variables can be used to express Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we use mutual information gain (MIG) [22] and f-score [23].Figure 5(a) presents the mutual information gain of the system’s variables with Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.It shows that the temperature of the nozzles depends on other temperature values, where the most important variables are Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, followed by Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ, and Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT that have a minor influence on the temperature of the mixture in the nozzle Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.In addition, according to the f-score, presented in Figure 5(b), ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ and Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT have a greater influence than the variables Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.Therefore, to ensure that the nozzle temperature only depends on other temperature values, we chose not to use ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ and Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to estimate Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.As a result, the variables Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT have been used to obtain different models based on the data for the evolution of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (8)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (9)

From this analysis, a regression tree, a neural network [24], and a polynomial model [25] for Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are computed and compared with each other.The mix’s temperature in the nozzles Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is given as a function of only Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.As described in Section II-B, a low number of experiments (30303030 in total) were performed, leading to a low number of data.It follows that all acquired data has to be used to estimate the models.In order to avoid overfitting, this is done using a cross-validation of 5555.The models are obtained by minimising the mean square error (MSE), [26].Finally, the models are validated on the 30303030 experiments themselves.

A simple form is imposed to determine the polynomial model giving Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as a function of Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.Therefore, minimizing the MSE, we obtain

Tn=79.5664+1.4220TTS+3.6303Tw1.8113Tasubscript𝑇n79.56641.4220subscript𝑇TS3.6303subscript𝑇w1.8113subscript𝑇aT_{\text{n}}=-79.5664+1.4220T_{\text{TS}}+3.6303T_{\text{w}}-1.8113T_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 79.5664 + 1.4220 italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 3.6303 italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1.8113 italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(21)

where all the temperatures are expressed in degree Celsius.The regression tree giving the value of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is presented in Figure 6.It has to be read as tests on the variables Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, expressed in degree Celsius.Depending on the position of these variables with given thresholds, indicated on the tree’s branches, we obtain a value, in degree Celsius, for Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (10)

For the neural model of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we optimize the properties of the neural network among the following possibilities:

  • the number of hidden layers is either 1111, 2222, or 3333;

  • each hidden layer can contain between 2222 and 10101010 neurons;

  • the activation function is either sigmoid𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑜𝑖𝑑sigmoiditalic_s italic_i italic_g italic_m italic_o italic_i italic_d, tanh𝑡𝑎𝑛tanhitalic_t italic_a italic_n italic_h, or relu𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑢reluitalic_r italic_e italic_l italic_u.

As for the other models, a 5-fold cross-validation is used and the characteristics of the neural network are obtained through minimisation of the MSE.The optimal characteristics of the neural model of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are presented in Table IV.

Hidden layers2
Neurons per layer10 & 4
Activation functionsigmoid

The proposed models are first validated on the data from previous experiments described in Section II-B.To do so, Figure 7(a) compares the values of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT obtained with the polynomial model (in red), the regression tree (in blue), and the neural model (in green) with the values of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from the 30 experiments in the data set.We see that the regression tree and the neural model behave better than the polynomial model.Figure 7(b) confirms this behaviour as it shows the error between each model and the data from the experiments, the colours being the same as in Figure 7(a).To further validate the models, we present the overall mean square error and mean absolute error (MAE) [26] for the different Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT models in Table V.It confirms that the regression tree and the neural model perform better than the polynomial model, with the neural model performing slightly better than the tree.However, due to the low quantity of data available in the data set, the regression tree shown in Figure 6 has a low number of possible states for Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.Therefore, we decide not to use it in the following as it might not work well in a more general simulation process.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (11)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (12)
ModelMSEMAE
Polynomial66.706.20
Regression tree10.682.03
Neural network9.571.97

III-E Test section

As already exposed, the goal of the plant is to inject a mix of air and water into the test section.As explained in Section II-A, the variables of importance are the liquid water content ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ and the median volumetric diameter MM\mathrm{M}roman_M.Two other variables, the temperature TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the wind velocity vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the test section are also important.However, they are regulated by external systems, so we consider them as input variables and focus on LWC and MVD modelling.

Liquid water content

According to [11], LWC ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ represents the mixing of the available mass of water mTSwsubscriptsuperscript𝑚wTSm^{\text{w}}_{\text{TS}}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT within a defined air volume VTSasubscriptsuperscript𝑉aTSV^{\text{a}}_{\text{TS}}italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the test section, given by

Λ=mTSwVTSa.Λsubscriptsuperscript𝑚wTSsubscriptsuperscript𝑉aTS.\Lambda=\frac{m^{\text{w}}_{\text{TS}}}{V^{\text{a}}_{\text{TS}}}\text{.}roman_Λ = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .(22)

The volume of air flowing through the test section can be calculated by VTSa=vTSATSsubscriptsuperscript𝑉aTSsubscript𝑣TSsubscript𝐴TSV^{\text{a}}_{\text{TS}}=v_{\text{TS}}A_{\text{TS}}italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where ATSsubscript𝐴TSA_{\text{TS}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the cross-sectional area of the test section.The available mass of water is mTSw=ρwQwsubscriptsuperscript𝑚wTSsubscript𝜌wsubscript𝑄wm^{\text{w}}_{\text{TS}}=\rho_{\text{w}}Q_{\text{w}}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT w end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.It follows that

Λ=ρwQwvTSATS.Λsubscript𝜌wsubscript𝑄wsubscript𝑣TSsubscript𝐴TS.\Lambda=\frac{\rho_{\text{w}}Q_{\text{w}}}{v_{\text{TS}}A_{\text{TS}}}\text{.}roman_Λ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .(23)

The MIG and f-score for the LWC, showing the influence of the plant’s variables over the LWC, are presented in Figure 8.They show that the flow of water Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plays indeed an important role in the expression of ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ as is implied by the relation (23).However, the influence of the air velocity in the test section vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is less important according to both the MIG and f-score.Nevertheless, the expression (23) is grounded into other experiments from other testbeds [11].Therefore, we decide to model the LWC with the expression given in equation (23).

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (13)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (14)

Mean volume diameter

As highlighted in the Introduction, the estimation of the MVD is a much more complicated task.In the literature, various measurement devices [11] or machine learning techniques [12] have been used, as mentioned previously.Therefore, from the data described in Section II-B, we follow the same methodology to model the MVD MM\mathrm{M}roman_M as we did for the temperature in the nozzle Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as exposed in Section III-D.

We start by obtaining the mutual information gain and f-score to know which variables have the greatest influence on the MVD’s value.The MIG and f-score for MVD are shown in Figure 9.According to the MIG values in Figure 9(a), the variables Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Twsubscript𝑇wT_{\text{w}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Tasubscript𝑇aT_{\text{a}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the variables that influence the MVD value.In addition, the variable Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has a more important influence compared to the others.This observation is in accordance with the f-score presented in Figure 9(b).

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (15)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (16)

Figures 8 and 9 show valuable information, as the LWC ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ does not appear to have a great influence on the value of MVD MM\mathrm{M}roman_M and vice versa.However, because of the definition of these two variables, if the liquid water content in the droplets is zero, we cannot get a median volumetric diameter.In addition, we already saw that LWC values depend on the water flow Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and MVD values depend on the air flow Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

It follows, by symmetry, and the influence that it has according to Figure 9, that we decide to express the MVD MM\mathrm{M}roman_M as a function of Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.From the previous discussion, we also decide to include the LWC ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ in the MVD’s expression.Finally, although they do not have a great influence on the MVD according to the values in Figure 9, we include the variables describing the conditions in the test section, i.e., the temperature TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the wind velocity vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as the MVD is measured in the test section.

As for the temperature of the mix of air and water in the nozzles Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we want to obtain a polynomial, a regression tree, and a neural model for the MVD.The process for obtaining them is the same as described in Section III-D.

To obtain the MVD polynomial, more complex forms than for Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are imposed.First, as Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has the highest influence on the MVD MM\mathrm{M}roman_M according to Figure 9, we propose a polynomial model where Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a factor of all terms composed of all possible combinations of 1 to 3 variables among ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the power 1111.Minimizing the MSE with this form, we obtain

M=44.38810.6299Qa+0.0178QavTS+0.0257QaTTS0.1530QaΛ+0.0012QavTSTTS0.0035QavTSΛ0.0546QaTTSΛ+0.0003QavTSTTSΛM44.38810.6299subscript𝑄a0.0178subscript𝑄asubscript𝑣TS0.0257subscript𝑄asubscript𝑇TS0.1530subscript𝑄aΛ0.0012subscript𝑄asubscript𝑣TSsubscript𝑇TS0.0035subscript𝑄asubscript𝑣TSΛ0.0546subscript𝑄asubscript𝑇TSΛ0.0003subscript𝑄asubscript𝑣TSsubscript𝑇TSΛ\mathrm{M}=44.3881-0.6299Q_{\text{a}}+0.0178Q_{\text{a}}v_{\text{TS}}+0.0257Q_%{\text{a}}T_{\text{TS}}\\-0.1530Q_{\text{a}}\Lambda+0.0012Q_{\text{a}}v_{\text{TS}}T_{\text{TS}}-0.0035%Q_{\text{a}}v_{\text{TS}}\Lambda\\-0.0546Q_{\text{a}}T_{\text{TS}}\Lambda+0.0003Q_{\text{a}}v_{\text{TS}}T_{%\text{TS}}\Lambdastart_ROW start_CELL roman_M = 44.3881 - 0.6299 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 0.0178 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 0.0257 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - 0.1530 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ + 0.0012 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.0035 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - 0.0546 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ + 0.0003 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_CELL end_ROW(24)

The second form we consider involves all possible combinations of products of 1 to 4 variables among Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ, TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the power 1111.Therefore, minimizing the MSE, we obtain

M=7.6323TTS+0.8825vTS+8.8270Λ+4.4380Qa+0.1419vTSTTS+0.4914TTSΛ0.1066vTSΛ+0.8393QaTTS0.0812QavTS0.9817QaΛ+0.0189vTSTTSΛ0.0141QaTTSvTS0.111QaTTSΛ0.0037QavTSΛ0.0023QaTTSvTSΛM7.6323subscript𝑇TS0.8825subscript𝑣TS8.8270Λ4.4380subscript𝑄a0.1419subscript𝑣TSsubscript𝑇TS0.4914subscript𝑇TSΛ0.1066subscript𝑣TSΛ0.8393subscript𝑄asubscript𝑇TS0.0812subscript𝑄asubscript𝑣TS0.9817subscript𝑄aΛ0.0189subscript𝑣TSsubscript𝑇TSΛ0.0141subscript𝑄asubscript𝑇TSsubscript𝑣TS0.111subscript𝑄asubscript𝑇TSΛ0.0037subscript𝑄asubscript𝑣TSΛ0.0023subscript𝑄asubscript𝑇TSsubscript𝑣TSΛ\mathrm{M}=-7.6323T_{\text{TS}}+0.8825v_{\text{TS}}+8.8270\Lambda+4.4380Q_{%\text{a}}\\+0.1419v_{\text{TS}}T_{\text{TS}}+0.4914T_{\text{TS}}\Lambda-0.1066v_{\text{TS%}}\Lambda\\+0.8393Q_{\text{a}}T_{\text{TS}}-0.0812Q_{\text{a}}v_{\text{TS}}-0.9817Q_{%\text{a}}\Lambda\\+0.0189v_{\text{TS}}T_{\text{TS}}\Lambda-0.0141Q_{\text{a}}T_{\text{TS}}v_{%\text{TS}}-0.111Q_{\text{a}}T_{\text{TS}}\Lambda\\-0.0037Q_{\text{a}}v_{\text{TS}}\Lambda-0.0023Q_{\text{a}}T_{\text{TS}}v_{%\text{TS}}\Lambdastart_ROW start_CELL roman_M = - 7.6323 italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 0.8825 italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 8.8270 roman_Λ + 4.4380 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + 0.1419 italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 0.4914 italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ - 0.1066 italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + 0.8393 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.0812 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.9817 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + 0.0189 italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ - 0.0141 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.111 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - 0.0037 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ - 0.0023 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_CELL end_ROW(25)

where the temperature TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is expressed in degree Celsius.The regression tree giving the value of MM\mathrm{M}roman_M is presented in Figure 10.It is interpreted in the same way that the regression tree for Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is interpreted as described in Section III-D.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (17)

The neural model of MM\mathrm{M}roman_M is obtained under the same conditions as the neural model of Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.Its optimal characteristics are presented in Table VI.

Hidden layers2
Neurons per layer2 & 7
Activation functionReLu

As for the temperature Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the proposed models are first validated on the data from previous experiments described in Section II-B.To do so, Figure 11(a) compares the MVD values MM\mathrm{M}roman_M obtained with the polynomial model from (24) (in brown), the polynomial model from (25) (in red), the regression tree (in blue), and the neural model (in green) with the values of MM\mathrm{M}roman_M from the 30 experiments in the data set.From the curve, it is difficult to properly separate the different models as they have quite a similar behaviour.Figure 11(b) confirms that as it shows the error between each model and the data from the experiments, the colours being the same as in Figure 11(a).To further validate the models, we present the overall mean square error and mean absolute error for the different MM\mathrm{M}roman_M models in Table VII.It confirms that the models behave really closely.However, with the values of Table VII, we decide not to use the polynomial model given by equation (24) as it clearly has poorer performance compared to the other models.As for the temperature in the nozzle Tnsubscript𝑇nT_{\text{n}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we also decide not to use the regression tree, we also decide not to consider the regression tree model given in Figure 10 as, due to the low number of data in the data set, gives a low number of possible states.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (18)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (19)
ModelsMSEMAE
Polynomial (24)20.7020.7020.7020.703.713.713.713.71
Polynomial (25)17.4717.4717.4717.472.842.842.842.84
Regression tree16.5016.5016.5016.503.103.103.103.10
Neural model16.7916.7916.7916.793.113.113.113.11

IV Results

In this section, we present results obtained in simulation and discuss the analysis and behaviour of the system.As mentioned previously, it is of great importance to have atmospheric conditions that encourage the study of variables such as LWC and MVD that are related to ice formation.The models developed in Section III are incorporated in interconnected modules in a Simulink model shown in Figure 12, which formed a hybrid model of the plant.A dashboard with different functionalities has been designed to simulate scenarios in which various modes of plant operation can be used.The results shown in this section are from a simulation of 20mintimes20minute20\text{\,}\mathrm{min}start_ARG 20 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_min end_ARG with a sampling time of 1stimes1second1\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG.The conditions considered in the simulation are described below.

  • The variables involved in the simulation process have been executed within the ranges of real conditions as shown in Table I.

  • Different valves have been activated and deactivated throughout the experiment.

  • In the simulation, changes in the temperature of the test section, as well as in the velocity of the test section, have been considered.

  • The temperature (TTSsubscript𝑇TST_{\text{TS}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and the velocity (vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) in the test section are considered variables controlled by an external system.

  • The flow through each valve is controlled by a PI controller (in the internal control loop) and the PI acts on the opening and closing area of the valves.

To observe the time response of LWC, a water flow Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of 6Lh1times6literhour16\text{\,}\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}start_ARG 6 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_h end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG from initial time to 442stimes442second442\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 442 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG, 5.5Lh1times5.5literhour15.5\text{\,}\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}start_ARG 5.5 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_h end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG from second 443stimes443second443\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 443 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG to 696stimes696second696\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 696 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG, and 6.5Lh1times6.5literhour16.5\text{\,}\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}start_ARG 6.5 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_h end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG from 697stimes697second697\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 697 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG to 1200stimes1200second1200\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 1200 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG, respectively, per conduit (see Figure 13(a)) has been applied.LWC is directly proportional to Qwsubscript𝑄wQ_{\text{w}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and inversely proportional to vTSsubscript𝑣TSv_{\text{TS}}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT TS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT according to the equation (23).Therefore, the changes in LWC shown in Figure 13(c) are due to the amount of water flow, the number of conduits used (Figure 13(e)) and the changes in velocity in the test section (Figure 13(f)).

MVD varies according to the equation (25) where Qasubscript𝑄aQ_{\text{a}}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has the strongest influence.As is done to LWC, an air flow per conduit of 6Lmin1times6literminute16\text{\,}\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{min}}^{-1}start_ARG 6 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_min end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG from the initial time to 576stimes576second576\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 576 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG, 6.2Lmin1times6.2literminute16.2\text{\,}\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{min}}^{-1}start_ARG 6.2 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_min end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG from 577stimes577second577\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 577 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG to 924stimes924second924\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 924 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG, and 5.7Lmin1times5.7literminute15.7\text{\,}\mathrm{L}\text{${\cdot}$}{\mathrm{min}}^{-1}start_ARG 5.7 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG start_ARG roman_L end_ARG start_ARG ⋅ end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_min end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG end_ARG from 925stimes925second925\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 925 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG to 1200stimes1200second1200\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 1200 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG has been applied during the simulation, as shown in Figure 13(b).The MVD dynamics is shown in Figure 13(d), it can be observed that for the values of air flow, and the variation of variables such as the number of conduits used, the velocity and temperature in the test section, as well as the LWC, the MVD values between 10101010 and 35µmtimes35micrometer35\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}start_ARG 35 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_µ roman_m end_ARG can be obtained.

Figures 14(a) and 14(b) show the flow of water through valves 1111 and 2222, it can be seen how the PI control maintains the desired flow through them.Figures 14(c) and 14(d) show the opening in mmmillimeter\mathrm{mm}roman_mm of the valves 1111 and 2222 through which the water flow passes.Furthermore, the behaviour of air through the valves 1111 and 2222 is shown in Figures 14(e) and 14(f), respectively.Whereas the opening of these valves is shown in Figures 14(g) and 14(h).The valve 1111 (water and air valves) are imposed an off and on behaviour at 240stimes240second240\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 240 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG and 480stimes480second480\text{\,}\mathrm{s}start_ARG 480 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_s end_ARG, respectively.

The dynamics of the whole system is highly complex, involving a large number of variables; however, the developed model allows us to study our system under different scenarios and allows us to achieve values close to experimental data.

A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (20)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (21)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (22)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (23)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (24)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (25)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (26)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (27)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (28)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (29)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (30)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (31)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (32)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (33)
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. (34)

V Conclusions

In this paper, mathematical modelling based on first principles and machine learning techniques has been developed to form a hybrid model that allows us to perform an in-depth study of the atmospheric conditions in icing structures, using a subsonic wind tunnel as a facility.A statistical analysis of experimental data has been carried out in order to have a global idea of the behaviour of the system, which has allowed us to develop machine learning models of some variables of interest in the plant under study.The implemented model has been validated with real data and delivers valuable results.

The proposed methodology has allowed us to establish the dynamics of LWC and MVD in a simulation environment, as well as allowing us to make several variations in the parameters involved in the model, in order to study in depth the atmospheric conditions suitable for ice formation.

In future work, we intend to use optimisation techniques in order to optimise parameters in the system and improve the performance.In addition, we intend to develop intelligent control strategies and advanced control strategies such as fuzzy control, reinforcement learning, and model predictive control that allow us to control the desired LWC and MVD values minimising the use of system resources.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Vincent Sircoulomb, Associate Professor at ESIGELEC, for his help on the COPOGIRT project.

References

  • [1]S.Li and R.Paoli, “Aircraft icing severity evaluation,”Encyclopedia, vol.2, no.1, pp. 56–69, 2022.
  • [2]N.Davis, A.N. Hahmann, N.-E. Clausen, and M.Žagar, “Forecast of icingevents at a wind farm in sweden,” Journal of Applied Meteorology andClimatology, vol.53, no.2, pp. 262–281, 2014.
  • [3]S.Dierer, R.Oechslin, and R.Cattin, “Wind turbines in icing conditions:performance and prediction,” Advances in Science and Research,vol.6, no.1, pp. 245–250, 2011.
  • [4]F.Martini, L.T. ContrerasMontoya, and A.Ilinca, “Review of wind turbineicing modelling approaches,” Energies, vol.14, no.16, 2021.
  • [5]J.Molinder, H.Körnich, E.Olsson, and P.Hessling, “The use ofuncertainty quantification for the empirical modeling of wind turbineicing,” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, vol.58,no.9, 2019.
  • [6]R.W. Gent, N.P. Dart, and J.T. Cansdale, “Aircraft icing,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A:Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 358, no. 1776, pp.2873–2911, 2000.
  • [7]Y.Cao, Z.Wu, Y.Su, and Z.Xu, “Aircraft flight characteristics in icingconditions,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol.74, pp. 62–80,2015.
  • [8]R.E. Kreeger, L.Sankar, R.Narducci, and R.Kunz, “Progress in rotorcrafticing computational tool development,” SAE Technical Paper, 2015.
  • [9]H.Dobesch, D.Nikolov, and L.Makkonen, “Physical processes, modelling andmeasuring of icing effects in europe,” ÖsterreichischeBeiträge zu Meterologie und Geophysik, vol.34, 2005.
  • [10]J.Yang, W.Yu, J.Choisnard, A.Forcione, and S.Antic, “Coupledatmospheric–ice load model for evaluation of wind plant power loss,”Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, vol.54, no.6, pp.1142–1161, 2015.
  • [11]I.Knop, S.E. Bansmer, V.Hahn, and C.Voigt, “Comparison of differentdroplet measurement techniques in the Braunschweig Icing Wind Tunnel,”Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol.14, no.2, pp. 1761–1781,2021.
  • [12]S.Rydblom and B.Thörnberg, “Measurement of atmospheric icing anddroplets,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,vol.69, no.8, pp. 5799–5809, 2020.
  • [13]C.R. Davison, J.D. MacLeod, and J.L. Chalmers, “Droplet evaporation modelfor determining liquid water content in engine icing tunnels and examinationof the factors affecting liquid water content,” in 9th AIAAAtmospheric and Space Environments Conference, 2017, p. 4246.
  • [14]MATLAB, version 9.13.0 (R2022b).Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc., 2022.
  • [15]S.M. Krosel, G.L. Cole, W.M. Bruton, and J.R. Szuch, “A lumped parametermathematical model for simulation of subsonic wind tunnels,” NASA, Tech.Rep., 1986.
  • [16]B.Ilić, M.Miloš, M.Milosavljević, and J.Isaković,“Model-based stagnation pressure control in a supersonic wind tunnel,”FME Transactions, vol.44, no.1, pp. 1–9, 2016.
  • [17]J.D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective,2nded., ser. Series in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990, vol.12.
  • [18]P.H. Oosthuizen and W.E. Carscallen, Introduction to Compressible FluidFlow, 2nded.Boca Raton, FL: CRCPress, 2013.
  • [19]Emerson, “Valve sizing calculation.”
  • [20]B.Ilić, M.Miloš, and J.Isaković, “Cascade nonlinearfeedforward-feedback control of stagnation pressure in a supersonic blowdownwind tunnel,” Measurement, vol.95, pp. 424–438, 2017.
  • [21]E.von Lavante, A.Zachcial, B.Nath, and H.Dietrich, “Unsteady effects incritical nozzles used for flow metering,” Measurement, vol.29,no.1, pp. 1–10, 2001.
  • [22]L.T. Vinh, S.Lee, Y.-T. Park, and B.J. d’Auriol, “A novel featureselection method based on normalized mutual information,” AppliedIntelligence, vol.37, pp. 100–120, 2012.
  • [23]C.Goutte and E.Gaussier, “A probabilistic interpretation of precision,recall and f-score, with implication for evaluation,” in Proceedingsof the European Conference on Information Retrieval.Springer, 2005, pp. 345–359.
  • [24]V.Rodriguez-Galiano, M.Sanchez-Castillo, M.Chica-Olmo, and M.Chica-Rivas,“Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: An evaluationof neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vectormachines,” Ore Geology Reviews, vol.71, pp. 804–818, 2015.
  • [25]G.K. Tso and K.K. Yau, “Predicting electricity energy consumption: Acomparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks,”Energy, vol.32, no.9, pp. 1761–1768, 2007.
  • [26]T.Chai and R.R. Draxler, “Root mean square error (rmse) or mean absoluteerror (mae)?–arguments against avoiding rmse in the literature,”Geoscientific model development, vol.7, no.3, pp. 1247–1250, 2014.
A Hybrid Modelling of a Water and Air Injector in a Subsonic Icing Wind Tunnel
††thanks: This work was supported by the Dispositif Recherche of Métropole Rouen Normandie through the COPOGIRT project.
For this reason and the purpose of Open Access, the aut (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tish Haag

Last Updated:

Views: 5464

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tish Haag

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 30256 Tara Expressway, Kutchburgh, VT 92892-0078

Phone: +4215847628708

Job: Internal Consulting Engineer

Hobby: Roller skating, Roller skating, Kayaking, Flying, Graffiti, Ghost hunting, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Tish Haag, I am a excited, delightful, curious, beautiful, agreeable, enchanting, fancy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.